Crypto Lobbying Needs a Reset: More FTC, less SEC
AD
Summary:Of all the Securities and Exchange Commission’s actions against crypto entities that have stirred the industry’s ire, the agency’s recent move forcing New York-based Paxos to cease issuing its partner Binance’s BUSD stablecoin is the most deserving of an outcry. How, critics rightfully asked, can a token that’s explicitly designed not to fluctuate in price be considered a security?

Of all the Securities and Exchange Commission’s actions against crypto entities that have stirred the industry’s ire, the agency’s recent move forcing New York-based Paxos to cease issuing its partner Binance’s BUSD stablecoin is the most deserving of an outcry. How, critics rightfully asked, can a token that’s explicitly designed not to fluctuate in price be considered a security?

Disclaimer:As an open information publishing platform, shilian only represents the author's personal views and has nothing to do with shilian. If the article, picture, audio or video contains infringement, violation or other inappropriate remarks, please provide relevant materials and send it to: 2785592653@qq.com.
Hint:The information provided on this site does not represent any investment suggestion. Investment is risky, and you must be cautious when entering the market.
ShilianFan group:Provide the latest hot news, airdrop candy, red envelopes and other benefits, WeChat: rtt4322.